dual citizenship

Pemba Paradise

Zanzibar Diaspora

Mwanakwerekwe shops ad

ZanzibarNiKwetuStoreBanner

ZNK Patreon

Scrolling news

************ KARIBUNI..................Contact us for any breaking news or for any information at: znzkwetu@gmail.com. You can also fax us at: 1.801.289.7713......................KARIBUNI

Thursday, August 30, 2012

Malawi: Need for food aid outpaces response
UN Integrated Regional Information Networks (IRIN) -August 30, 2012
Blantyre (Malawi) - Prolonged dry spells followed by poor harvests in Malawi’s maize-growing central and southern regions have created widespread food shortages, yet it has taken months to fully determine the extent of the crisis, and it may take several more to fund and implement a comprehensive response.
Estimates at the beginning of 2012 put the number of Malawians facing food shortages at about 202,000 in 10 districts, prompting the government to impose a ban on maize exports; the figure was later revised to include an additional 70,000. But a more detailed assessment by the Malawi Vulnerability Assessment Committee (MVAC) released in July found that 1.63 million people - 11 percent of the total population - might not have enough food to meet their basic needs over the next three to eight months. They are concentrated in 15 districts, all in Malawi’s central and southern regions, an area perennially plagued by unpredictable rains and poor harvests.

Part of the reason behind the steep increase in numbers was the move by incoming President Joyce Banda in May to devalue the local currency by nearly 50 percent. It was an effort to boost exports and woo back international donors that had abandoned the country during the final year of former President Bingu wa Mutharika’s increasingly autocratic rule.

The devaluation, widely viewed as “a necessary evil”, triggered substantial increases in the prices of many basic goods, including maize. For many rural households in drought-hit districts, the high maize prices have made it difficult or impossible to supplement poor harvests.

“I do not know what to do now; our harvest was very bad,” said Nancy Kumwenda from Ntcheu, one of the districts in central Malawi affected by the food shortage. “We got less than a bag of maize from our land. The whole crop just withered away.”

Kumwenda’s eight children, plus three children of relatives in her care, depend solely on her for their school fees, clothing and food.

''We got less than a bag of maize from our land. The whole crop just withered away''
Meanwhile, K. Kamwendo, 85, from the village of Domasi in southern Zomba District, is unsure how he is going to survive the year on two small bags of maize, the only food in the house. Because of his advanced age, Kamwendo does not till the land but buys what he can and relies on his neighbours to donate some maize when they have a good crop. This year, his neighbours have little to spare for him.

Nearly all of the households IRIN visited in Balaka, Ntcheu, Zomba, Chiradzulu, Chikwawa and Nsanje districts told similar stories. Only farmers cultivating along the Shire River in Nsanje managed to produce sufficient harvests.

Anderson Vishalona, senior group village headman in the southern Chikwawa district, estimated that six out of 10 people in Mwana wa Njovu, a village of over 3,000, were already going hungry. “The rest do not have enough food to last them until the end of the year. The situation is very bad,” he said.

Poor urban households have also been affected. “The price of maize has more than doubled,” said Blessings Banda, who lives in Blantyre, Malawi’s commercial capital. Like most city residents, Banda does not grow his own maize. “It is no longer possible to feed my family the way I used to before. I am really worried.”

The extent to which urban populations will need food assistance will become clearer later this month when the government and humanitarian agencies release their findings from an urban food security assessment.

Following the July MVAC findings, the Malawi government released a detailed response plan. It appeals for international support to fund interventions in the food, agriculture, education and health sectors, at a cost of US$89.3 million. According to the UN’s Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), only $18 million has so far been raised to cover the immediate need for food assistance.

None of the households that IRIN interviewed had yet received any food aid, but according to World Food Programme (WFP) spokesperson Pamela Kuwali, food distributions began on 1 August in three districts and will reach 715,000 people in 10 districts by October. The Malawi government has contributed 25,000 metric tons of maize from the country’s Strategic Grain Reserve, the UK’s Department for International Development (DFID) has donated $4.7 million to cover the costs of transporting and distributing food during the first three months of the relief operation, and US Agency for International Development (USAID) has given nearly $8 million.

In a statement released in July, WFP Country Director Abdoulaye Diop confirmed the seriousness of the situation. “Our field staff has observed that households in parts of the country have harvested almost nothing,” he said. “Our first priority will be to make sure that vulnerable people have enough food to sustain themselves through this lean season. At the same time, we must invest in more long-term solutions to build resilience and break the cycle of hunger.”

Building long-term solutions to hunger is a mammoth task. Most Malawians depend on rain-fed agriculture to grow maize despite increasingly unpredictable rainfall, especially in the southern parts of the country where districts such as Chikwawa, Zomba and Nsanje are experiencing their fourth consecutive year of dry weather followed by poor harvests. Analysts say that the country’s dependence on maize and a lack of irrigation puts Malawians at perennial risk of food shortages when rains fail.

“The problem with maize is that there is always either an oversupply or an undersupply in Malawi. When there is an oversupply, everybody has the crop and the prices go down drastically. Farmers are unable to get rid of excess crop, and that leads to heavy post-harvest losses. When there is undersupply, the prices shoot up, and everybody is scrambling to get maize. But Malawi can easily feed itself if people opted for other [crops] and used irrigation instead of depending on rain,” said Victor Gondwe, who practices small-scale irrigation farming in Ntcheu District.

Instead of relying on expensive fertilizer, he uses compost and animal manure from poultry, rabbits and goats, which also feed his family. He pointed out that maize requires large quantities of rain and fertilizer, and that growing crops such as sorghum, millet, sweet potato and cassava could help address Malawi’s hunger problem.

The government’s food security response plan includes longer-term interventions to build the resilience of rural households to unpredictable weather such as training farmers on more sustainable farming practices, promoting crop diversification and distributing small livestock and treadle pumps for irrigation, but this portion of the plan currently remains unfunded.

Source: Africa News Update

3 comments :

  1. My advice to Mrs Banda, stop this stupid conflict of lake nyasa and deal with the real issue facing your people. Pull yourself up and help your people with strategies that would stop the famine and liberate those in need from the threat of hunger. While your goverment spend lots of tax payers money arguing with the Tz goverment on the ownership of lake nyasa based on colonial border drawings, your people are feelin the pinch of the real sense of famine slowly engulfing village after village. No one in this world who is sane enough would encourage your goverment to pursue an expensive case against neighbouring countries sharing the lake as it is quite simple u would end up loosing the case. Grow up and stop this nonsense.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am NOT Mrs Banda, but my advice to you is to read the following from one of our local papers!

    By Cedrick Ngalande August 6, 2012
    At around the time of independence quite a few people in Tanzania wanted to claim a huge part of Lake Malawi or Lake Nyasa . Cool heads eventually prevailed, as most Tanzanians, including the legendary President Julius Nyerere, understood the importance of respecting boundaries emanating from colonial times. During most of Dr Kamuzu Banda’s rule, Tanzania never really pushed this crazy idea of dividing up the lake. The issue was almost forgotten during the rule of Dr Bakili Muluzi and thereafter. In fact, Dr Bingu wa Mutharika commissioned a company to start exploring oil in the lake. Tanzania said nothing at that time. Now we have a new president and all of sudden the Tanzanians are demanding that our government stop all exploration activities in the lake until all border issues have been clarified. Why now? Folks, there is a reason why we have tradition. Tradition may appear useless and outdated but it is important because it usually become established after a long experience. In politics there is what is known as ‘presidential protocol’. These are small things which over the years have proven to be niceties a president must or must not do in order to represent his/her country correctly.

    Government must make clear that no part of Malawi is up for discussion – full stop! It is time to show strength. Tell Tanzania that Lake Malawi was, is and will always be Malawian. Surprisingly, after all these arrogant statements by the Tanzania government, our government’s response is at best a whimper. The minister of foreign affairs has issued a statement saying the issue will be settled ‘amicably’. Really, Mr. Minister? What could be an amicable statement? Are you planning to even dignify Tanzania’s unreasonable demand? Do you plan to divide up the lake? How can you have an amicable settlement to an unreasonable demand?

    ReplyDelete
  3. one thing for sure, u need to start using ur own brain instead of following a neo journalist blinded by the propaganda aims to gain sympathy through nationalism rhetorics.

    "No part of Malawi is for disscusion", Why on earth are you talkin to Tanzania for then? It is obvious that the lake isnt yet a Malawi territory, those are just claims and counter claims by Tanzania. what happens then if International Community agreed with Tanzania that the lake belongs to both Tanzania and Malawi?

    I dont need to go on reading some ones opinion whhen i can use my own to make a judgment based on the factys on the table, my advice to Mrs Banda was to deal with the real issue of famine in her so called loving country.

    I'd say lets take this nonsence to the International community and get it sorted once and for all, and who ever ends up winnin the argument both parties should respect the outcome.
    Foum.

    ReplyDelete